Negative BNE was observed in pasture land-use and in peatland, various
forests, and wetland ecosystems (n = 29) with the majority of observations
coming from pasture (n = 12) and peatland (n = 11). This is
consistent with Chapuis–Lardy et al. (2007) who also reported soil
N2O consumption in unfertilized agricultural and natural ecosystems. There were no significant differences in negative BNE across
land-use or ecosystem types and the median values ranged from -0.05 to -0.33 kg
N2O−N ha−1 yr−1. The pasture sites exhibiting
negative BNE were located in humid, temperate regions in soils with typically high
organic matter (SOC > 24 mg kg-1) and near neutral pH (mean of
6.9 for this pasture data subset; data not shown). The wide soil C:N ratios,
N-limited status, and/or intermittent anaerobic conditions in these several terrestrial
ecosystems showing negative BNE could also interact to cause the observed uptakes
of atmospheric N2O by these soils. Furthermore, with particular
focus on peatland and wetland sites, soil N2O consumption could be
stimulated by anaerobic conditions, low mineral N, and readily available
organic C forms as energy sources for denitrifying microbial activity leading
to increased reduction of N2O to dinitrogen (Bremner 1997; Chapuis–Lardy et al.
2007).
The large majority of the BNE data compiled in our meta-analysis was
positive (efflux). The frequency of negative
BNE values (influx) observed in our meta-analysis was only 3.2% of the total
number of collated BNE data (n = 907). Moreover, observed negative BNE values were one order of magnitude lower than typical BNEA and BNEN values. Based on the magnitude and frequency of negative BNE, this
meta-analysis suggests that contribution of negative BNE to global N2O
budget as a sink of atmospheric N2O can be minor.
No comments:
Post a Comment